Dear
@Emerald Drifter,
I now have very little hope for real any SOLUTIONS to the CU issue outside of court. Suggestions were made on the previous locked thread with little to no acknowledgement or feedback by CU folks. And
NO COMPROMISE is the mantra of CU “leaders”. And besides all the name calling (a plethora of names BTW) by CU proponents, well some things never change. And here’s more of why I see it this way:
If something
is “
criminal”, then it must be because someone has done something that is “criminal” thus making them a “criminal”.
So a couple of days ago, Dave Rauschkolb posted on Walton County Visioning Facebook page,
“It’s just a travesty that people can’t go to the beach whatever they want. It’s
criminal really.”
With his obvious disdain for private property rights advocates, he, in essence, has labeled them as criminals. Yet another name (name calling) has been added to the list. Please show me where I’ve misinterpreted his statement.