the vote is to expand the power of the union to appoint a super, nothing more
Maybe the Teacher's Union is strong where you live, but it is a mess in Walton County. It may as well not exist. If you believe they are running this show, think again.
the vote is to expand the power of the union to appoint a super, nothing more
Maybe the Teacher's Union is strong where you live, but it is a mess in Walton County. It may as well not exist. If you believe they are running this show, think again.
As usual you know nothing. All I stated was fact. Not my vote.
Quite the opposite, you should pay better attention.
As is the case of almost every Union these days they are totally impotent and facing extinction.
Which is why they are throwing all backs to the rows on this one.
The common voter folk of Walton county have been able to choose the super until this vote,
which hasn't always been a Union puppet of their choosing so they are desperate to garner
more than a one person-one vote ratio exactly because they are so few and impotent.
I don't blame them it makes good politics sense and any tiny victory must mean everything to them these days.
Just don't believe this Yes vote empowers anyone but the teachers union, because it's nonsense
Ok Bob Hudson, JDarg, JP Nettles, Teachers Aide, AndyA, WaltonParent, the gigs up, Seaducer is onto us. One of the few things I may agree with some of you on and we got caught by a novice. Where did we go wrong, oh where?
I have a name for you Seaducer, so if you would like to find out what it is lets meet.
If you mean, do I pay buttloads of property and sales tax in Walton, then yes.
If you mean, do I like anyone in office, or even know their phone numbers, or have
even an ounce of influence with them?, then once again it's a blatant lie told by
lazy simple minded people who can't rationalize the opposite opinion they hold.
face it just because you have been hand fed this pablum by the WCEA
doesn't mean anyone not eating it is somehow misunderstanding the issue
the vote is to expand the power of the union to appoint a super, nothing more
Would a hired superintendent, for example, be harder to get rid of? I'm thinking teachers unions/tenure /etc.